Skip Overview
![[[alt/icon]]](https://sn-dev.totara-ready-to-use.com/theme/image.php/sn/block_sn_course_intro/1758188925/pre_requisites "[[alt/icon]]")
![[[alt/icon]]](https://sn-dev.totara-ready-to-use.com/theme/image.php/sn/block_sn_course_intro/1758188925/learning_objectives "[[alt/icon]]")
![[[alt/icon]]](https://sn-dev.totara-ready-to-use.com/theme/image.php/sn/block_sn_course_intro/1758188925/contributors "[[alt/icon]]")
Overview
Introduction
Focusing on clinical experience of the REDAPT Hip Revision System, this module outlines how implant choice contributes to success in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty (rTHA). It compares the design features of the REDAPT Hip Revision System to other solutions in terms of fixation, subsidence, fractures, and corrosion and review the clinical data.
Pre-requisites
- A good understanding the basic principles of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty (rTHA) is recommended
What you will learn
- Identify surgical objectives in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty (rTHA) and how implant choice contributes to success
- Compare the monoblock stem design, taper geometry, and fixation composition to other solutions
- Interpret clinical data on the REDAPT Hip Revision System
Contributors
- Dr Ran Schwarzkopf, United States of America
Show more
Accreditations
Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCS Eng)
Learn more
Royal College of Surgeons of England*
*This Smith+Nephew Medical Education eLearning content is accredited by the RCS (Royal College of Surgeons of England) as part of the centre accreditation. You will receive a certificate of attendance upon full completion of the module.
Show more